Should exam the National be abolished ?
The national examination or was called by
the UN (national exam) and UNAS (national final school exams) is a standard
system of primary and secondary education were conducted nationally appropriate
education minister's decision and based on Law No. 20 of 2003. The
determination of standardized tests national in Indonesia continues to be
improved from year to year with the aim to improve and promote the quality of
education in Indonesia. Determination of the quality standards of education is
the determination of the value of the limit, which means that someone will not
pass if it can not exceed or equal the value specified limits. This limit value
from year to year is always raised, for example, when my first junior national
test limit value is only 5.0 and now has reached 5.5.
Someone will be passed from a national
exam if the students are already able to exceed the limit value. Instead,
someone would not pass the national exams when students are not able to achieve
the expected limit value. Limit values serves as a determinant of whether or
not graduate students, but it also has a function to separate students who
graduated and students who do not pass. At the time of elementary school (SD)
there are 3 subjects in the test national namely Indonesian, mathematics and
natural sciences. As for the junior secondary schools (SMP) there are 4
subjects in the test national namely Mathematics, Indonesian, Natural Sciences
and English. The higher the level of the school, the more subjects at the 2015
graduation test results national (except for universities). For high school
(SMA) and vocational schools (SMK) or the equivalent there are 6 subjects in
the test nasionalkan Science, Social Studies, Mathematics, Indonesian language,
English and vocational.
The purpose of the national exam nice to
hold namely to advance the quality of education in Indonesia. But keep in mind
that Indonesia's vast territory and has a diversity of ethnicity, race,
religion, un 2015 will be a challenge itself for the implementation of the
national exam. One area to another is not the same, it could be people living
in cities will be smarter (because they eat nutritious foods continues), while
those who are in the interior will be slightly behind. Controversy national
exam continues to be a problem that if she could not to be resolved. Some argue
that the national exam would be made as to the quality of education is better,
but there is also the opinion that the national examinations should be removed
because the intellect of students throughout Indonesia is not the same.
Judging from the task of teachers in
schools as an educator and it is the duty of teachers to provide an assessment
of student achievement. In the assessment of student achievement is teacher has
carried out such tests exams formative and summative tests that will be
calculated to determine the final scores to determine students' graduation to
the subjects that followed. In the junior and senior secondary education level
there are a lot of subjects studied. While the UN is only three or four
subjects in accordance with UN POS that will be tested as well as a graduation
requirement.
Then why do this during the student
should pass the cost, energy and time to learn the other subjects? This means
that the UN is not effective as the standard graduation. There are things that
must be addressed by the government before implementing the UN among others
equating educational facilities in the city and in the country and the need for
quality distribution of teachers throughout the school. The next graduation
assessment standards should include aspects on gogis (cognitive, psychomotor
and affective) thoroughly.
The first , UN instead of forming the
character of hard work, but instead formed a liar and cunning character because
the UN are "forced" to be passed then there cheat. cheating in
education will continue to root for the community (student / teacher / parent)
have the perception that academic value is a benchmark of achievement, pride,
as well as the only indicator and a 'bridge' in careers, employment prospects,
and financial success in the future .in the perception was still lingering in
the community: parents will tend to demand that his children scored
consistently high academic. Teachers will focus on achievement, the average
value of the UN, race / Olympics and things that could be a school social
status symbol rather than oriented to how to develop the potential and student
learning experience fun and enjoyable.
When students see that the academic value
is crucial to be offered for parents, as well as if it becomes absolutely
necessary to be able to 'survive' in the future. Then measure the success of
the learner is only focused on value and not on understanding the discipline of
science. In such a perspective, do not be surprised if Indonesia is rich
'achievement' and often won the Science Olympiad competition / quiz. But the
number of wins the Olympics was not balanced by the number of sons and
daughters of Indonesia that really work in the world of science. In the same
perspective as well, do not be surprised if the culture of cheating to get
academic values continue entrenched in every generation of students.
Second, Less make be wary punishment for
those caught cheating. Penalties for those caught cheating, weve be
"cruel" really. From the start the test scores of zero, may not join
the next test, called a parent, even the most extreme could be out of school /
university. But in fact, although somewhat sadistic punishment, yet cheat
culture and cooperation is still rife, than we talk about 'effective sanctions'
or campaigning on the values of honesty and integrity as a student. Caves think
it would be more effective if we discuss the long-term Consequences of
cheating-cheating habit is for the benefit of the students themselves in the
future.
In
conclusion, The national examination or was called by the UN (national exam)
and UNAS (national final school exams) is a standard system of primary and
secondary education were conducted nationally appropriate education minister's
decision and based on Law No. 20 of 2003. so this was why his final school
examinations should be abolished. UN instead of forming the character of hard
work, but instead formed a liar and cunning character because the UN are
"forced" to be passed then there cheat. Less make wary punishment for
those caught cheating. Penalties for those caught cheating, weve be
"cruel" really.
REFERENCE
Pilipus M.(2015) EFEKTIVITAS
UJIAN NASIONAL (UN) https://pealtwo.wordpress.com/efektivitas-ujian-nasional-un/
Setiawan,D (2012)
Definisi Tentang Ujian Nasional http://dedi-smk.blogspot.co.id/2013/04/definisi-tentang-ujian-nasional.html
Ardi, Glenn
(2006) Diskusi: Budaya curang dalam Ujian
https://www.zenius.net/blog/11750/mencontek-nyontek-kerja-sama-bocoran-soal-jawaban
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar